Mr Portman bans Tokyo*, but who complained?
Today, we received correspondence from Mr Portman that he has, in all his infinite wisdom, decided to deprive the British public of Tokyo*. We have, once again, violated the eternal and enduring code (it is kinda like the 12 commandments for alcohol peeps, Portman plays Moses). Section 3.2(f) is also a new one to add to our collection, I do not believe we have violated this one before which is neat. Another thing scored off our ‘things to do before 30 list’, I had thought we may struggle to get past 3.2(d).
Here is an extract from their communication.
Complainants:
member of the public
Decision:
Under Code paragraph 3.2(f) UPHELD
The Panel noted that the bottle label featured the statement: “Everything in moderation, including moderation itself. What logically follows is that you must, from time, have excess. This beer is for those times.” The Panel considered that this was advocating excessive consumption and furthermore considered that this was particularly unwise in the context of a product that contained six units of alcohol in a single 330ml bottle. Accordingly, it found the product’s packaging in breach of Code paragraph 3.2(f).
Sliding Scale of good to evil, from which end you start from is subjective.
The statement actually offended me. I offended myself with my own statement, retrospectively of course which excludes any possibility of schizophrenia mudding the waters. Real-time simultaneous offense and gratification is not my thing, I have a brewery to run. This is still condemningly ironic however, considering I actually penned the aforementioned fine prose. Alarmingly the more I mused over it, the more offended I became, the more I thought this simple statement may actually lead to the downfall of Western civilisation. I was not sleeping, not thinking straight, reduced to a shadow of my former self, crushed under the weight of this moral dilemma to trump all moral dilemmas.
When I could take the internal wrangle any longer, I confided my fears, laid open my soul (or my pseudonym’s soul to be precise) and gambled all our collective destinies by confiding in the only one deemed capable of making up for the apparent shortfall in consumer intelligence.
I put the entire fate of Tokyo* in the hands of the only bright shining light of morality, reason and justice in our troubled times – Mr Portman.
I lay my bear naked body at his sacrificial alter (not literally).
Join the Discussion
Comments (12)
David Poley
Chief Executive, the Portman Group...
Translation: We at the portman group are in favour of communism and not free market practices, you must not stand out of the crowed. You will do as we say, when tell you.
It doesnt affect the brewerys production at all, but retailers in the UK who wish to sell it will do so on pain of a fine / having their license restricted for a short time period / completely revoked.
If this is true, its a spectacular own goal.
Maybe everyone should lodge a complaint about the portman group!
surley they have by banning Toyko* they broke rule 3.2(c) suggest any association with,acceptance of, or allusion to,
illicit drugs; (drugs are banned so banning brewdog Toyko* is saying its a illicit drug)!!
Perhaps I should complain to the portman group :-)
Seriously though, bad news for a really remarkable beer (which was shared among three adults when I samped it, so the excess was moderated in a way I would have thought Mr Portman would have approved of!)